Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises Giochi Preziosi on the acquisition of Muñecas Arias
GA_P has advised the Italian toy company Giochi Preziosi, which is already the leader in Spain in manufacturing and sales after acquiring Famosa in 2019, on the acquisition of another historic Spanish brand, the Alicante-based company Muñecas Arias. With this acquisition, the group strengthens its position in the dolls category at European level.
The Giochi Preziosi Group, an Italian multinational with more than 40 years of history, is currently one of the largest European players in the traditional toy industry.
Advised on the transaction: Pablo Fernández Cortijo, partner of Commercial, Mónica Ojeda, associate of Commercial, Mònica Montoro, PMA of Commercal, Lourdes Escassi, Of Counsel of Employment, Delia Castaños, Jesús Tallos, associates of Employment, Silvana Zarzar, associate of Employment, Isabela Crespo, associate of Industrial, Intellectual Property and Technology Elisa Gómez-Bernardo, associate of Industrial, Intellectual Property and Technology, Marta Rey and Ester Abascal, associates of public law.
The Giochi Preziosi Group, an Italian multinational with more than 40 years of history, is currently one of the largest European players in the traditional toy industry.
Advised on the transaction: Pablo Fernández Cortijo, partner of Commercial, Mónica Ojeda, associate of Commercial, Mònica Montoro, PMA of Commercal, Lourdes Escassi, Of Counsel of Employment, Delia Castaños, Jesús Tallos, associates of Employment, Silvana Zarzar, associate of Employment, Isabela Crespo, associate of Industrial, Intellectual Property and Technology Elisa Gómez-Bernardo, associate of Industrial, Intellectual Property and Technology, Marta Rey and Ester Abascal, associates of public law.
Lawyer mentioned
Pablo Fernández Cortijo – Partner
Lourdes Escassi – Counsel
See all lawyers
See less lawyers
Tipology
Deal
Areas and sectors
Press contact

Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications

Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Warning: Undefined array key 2 in /app/wp-content/plugins/wpml-media-translation/classes/class-wpml-media-attachment-by-url-query.php on line 99
Warning: Undefined array key 2 in /app/wp-content/plugins/wpml-media-translation/classes/class-wpml-media-attachment-by-url-query.php on line 163
Warning: Undefined array key 10 in /app/wp-content/plugins/wpml-media-translation/classes/class-wpml-media-attachment-by-url-query.php on line 163
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
20 May, 2025
Royal Decree 214/2025: obligation to calculate carbon footprints, draw up emission reduction plans and publicly disclose the same
Royal Decree 214/2025 does not create a new register, as its title suggests, but rather keeps and expands the one in place since 2014. What is truly new is the obligation imposed on specific companies and public bodies to calculate their carbon footprint and to draw up greenhouse gas emission reduction plans, as well as to publish the same. The royal decree’s succinct wording raises some questions of interpretation.
PUBLICATION
14 May, 2025
Permanent incapacity, except if employee decides otherwise or if an excessive burden on employer, no longer triggers termination of contract
The obligation to accommodate the workplace for persons with a permanent incapacity has come to the fore with such incapacity no longer constituting an automatic termination-of-employment-contract event. Now, unless the employee intends otherwise, the employer has three months to make necessary adjustments or to offer a suitable vacant post, and a failure to do so that is not justified on the grounds of excessive burden means not only a breach of law with all its consequences, but also the continuation of the employer/employee relationship with all its consequences.
PUBLICATION
12 May, 2025
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 26
Summary of legislative and case law developments in the automotive sector.
PUBLICATION
16 Apr, 2025
Pharma & Healthcare No. 43
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
PUBLICATION
15 Apr, 2025
Payment period and accrual of late payment interest in public contracts: latest controversial Supreme Court ruling
Supreme Court Judgment no. 5938/2024, which confirms its doctrine on the payment period and the accrual of late payment interest in public contracts, is examined. This doctrine, which establishes a general 60-day period, raises doubts as to its compatibility with Directive 2011/7/EU and with the CJEU’s case law.
PUBLICATION
27 Mar, 2025
The notion of ‘pharmacological action’ in the legal concept of medicinal product
A look at the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-589/23, Cassella-med and MCM Klosterfrau, ECLI:EU:C:2025:173.
PUBLICATION
25 Mar, 2025
A first ranking mortgage does not prevent a creditor from accelerating loan maturity due to debtor insolvency
If the creditor has a secured claim (even if the debt is covered by the "value of the security", i.e. the claim is in the money), the debtor cannot avoid the effects of the to-term forfeiture by appealing to the existence of that security because the guarantee referred to in Article 1129(1) of the Civil Code (avoiding to-term forfeiture) must then be another additional guarantee.
PUBLICATION
25 Mar, 2025
La existencia de una hipoteca de primer rango no impide que el acreedor pueda declarar el vencimiento anticipado del plazo por insolvencia sobrevenida del deudor
Si el acreedor goza de una garantía real para la seguridad de su crédito (incluso si la deuda está cubierta por el «valor de la garantía», es decir, que el crédito está in the money), el deudor no puede evitar los efectos de la pérdida del plazo apelando a la existencia de aquella garantía real porque la garantía a que se refiere el artículo 1129.1.º del Código Civil (evitadora de la pérdida del plazo) deberá ser entonces otra garantía suplementaria.
PUBLICATION
20 Mar, 2025
Use of environmental claims in advertising: the Iberdrola v. Repsol case
Santander Companies Court No. 2 Judgment no. 12/2025 of 21 February, which is not conclusive, is analysed.