Go back to News
NEWS
Gómez Acebo & Pombo closes 2022 with 10% growth in Spain
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo closes 2023 with a net turnover of almost 84 million euros (€ 83.83,000M) in fiscal year 2022, which represents a growth of 10%on the previous year’s turnover and an all-time high in the Firm’s turnover. In Spain, net revenues exceeded 75 million euros (€ 75.17 M) for the first time, representing an increase of 9.8% from the previous year.
At the practice area level, Corporate & Commercial represents 31% of total revenues. Banking, Capital Markets & Insurance, in turn, represents 15%, so that together the areas with the highest levels of transactions account for almost half of the Firm’s turnover, having grown by more than 11% with respect to the previous period. The other practice areas have also performed very favourably during the year. This is the case of Public Law, with a very remarkable growth, or Tax, Intellectual Property and Criminal Law, all of them with growth also above 10%.
In terms of offices, although all of them have performed well, billing is mainly concentrated in Madrid, which represents 75% of total billing in Spain. Lisbon, on the other hand, accounts for 9% of total billings.
Partner Iñigo Erlaiz says: “We are very satisfied with the results achieved. Growth is not an objective in itself but, together with other relevant indicators, it is evidence that we are on the right path to achieve our true objective of positioning ourselves as a benchmark firm in each and every one of our practice areas. The project is one of positioning, which is why we are also satisfied with the improvements in directories achieved during the year and with our outstanding position in the transaction rankings, both in terms of number and volume of transactions advised. It is a quiet and healthy growth, essentially organic and due to the advice we provide linked to higher value-added matters, rather than to an increase in headcount”.
Finally, Iñigo Erlaiz emphasizes that “Quality is the essential vector of the project. This year we have also launched various initiatives aimed at improving the organization’s productivity and efficiency in order to provide a better service to our clients. All this without losing our essence, in which proximity and the personal touch are differentiating factors that we continue to nurture”.
At the practice area level, Corporate & Commercial represents 31% of total revenues. Banking, Capital Markets & Insurance, in turn, represents 15%, so that together the areas with the highest levels of transactions account for almost half of the Firm’s turnover, having grown by more than 11% with respect to the previous period. The other practice areas have also performed very favourably during the year. This is the case of Public Law, with a very remarkable growth, or Tax, Intellectual Property and Criminal Law, all of them with growth also above 10%.
In terms of offices, although all of them have performed well, billing is mainly concentrated in Madrid, which represents 75% of total billing in Spain. Lisbon, on the other hand, accounts for 9% of total billings.
Partner Iñigo Erlaiz says: “We are very satisfied with the results achieved. Growth is not an objective in itself but, together with other relevant indicators, it is evidence that we are on the right path to achieve our true objective of positioning ourselves as a benchmark firm in each and every one of our practice areas. The project is one of positioning, which is why we are also satisfied with the improvements in directories achieved during the year and with our outstanding position in the transaction rankings, both in terms of number and volume of transactions advised. It is a quiet and healthy growth, essentially organic and due to the advice we provide linked to higher value-added matters, rather than to an increase in headcount”.
Finally, Iñigo Erlaiz emphasizes that “Quality is the essential vector of the project. This year we have also launched various initiatives aimed at improving the organization’s productivity and efficiency in order to provide a better service to our clients. All this without losing our essence, in which proximity and the personal touch are differentiating factors that we continue to nurture”.
Press contact
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Sandra Cuesta
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
PUBLICATION
03 Mar, 2026
Legal doctrine of the UPC’s Court of Appeal on the patent invalidity defence: is the way in which the ‘long arm’ is applied compatible with the UPC's own Rules of Procedure?
The Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court has ruled that a patent invalidity defence cannot be raised before the Unified Patent Court, with only a counterclaim being possible. This calls into question the way in which the ‘long arm’ is being applied with regard to European patents validated in States that are not party to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (UPCA), whether or not they are members of the European Union, since no counterclaim for revocation or plea of invalidity as a defence can be filed or raised with regard to such patents. This raises significant doubts about the compatibility of how the ‘long arm’ is applied in the Unified Patent Court system, given its own Rules of Procedure.
PUBLICATION
26 Feb, 2026
A restructuring plan sanctioned in England and Wales that modifies debt subject to German law has no effect in Germany
Recognition of UK restructuring plans remains a contentious issue in the European Union. This decision by the Frankfurt am Main Regional Court is controversial, but it raises questions about the consequences of the application of the rule in Gibbs by the courts of England and Wales in this context.
PUBLICATION
26 Feb, 2026
Pharma & Healthcare No. 47
The newsletter covers the main developments in Pharma & Healthcare legislation and case law.
PUBLICATION
23 Feb, 2026
Irregularities in public sector staffing. Jurisdiction and/or substantive law
When a serious irregularity is found in administrative contracts owing to their employment character, jurisdiction lies with the employment branch of the court system. However, if the administrative route is not outside the scope of the law, jurisdiction lies with the judicial review branch of the court system.
PUBLICATION
17 Feb, 2026
Squeeze-out of minority shareholders following successful mandatory takeover bid: rebuttable presumption of fair consideration
The Court of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber), in its judgment of 27 November 2025 (Case C-567/24, Svema Trade), concerning the equitable price in a squeeze-out requiring minority shareholders to sell their shares to an offeror who, following a mandatory takeover bid, has acquired more than 90% of the capital carrying voting rights in the company subject of the takeover bid, states that the presumption that the price offered in the bid, in the context of such a squeeze-out of holders of securities, is equitable is rebuttable.
PUBLICATION
13 Feb, 2026
Senior management, membership of the board of directors and insolvency proceedings: single association theory yes, but also employer-employee relationship
Despite classifying the association as a commercial relationship and not an employment relationship, compensation amounts for termination of contract are allowed if they match those accepted by the insolvency practitioners, just as remuneration amounts are allowed if said practitioners had decided to accept remuneration in some months but not in others.
PUBLICATION
10 Feb, 2026
Application of Austrian law to liability in tort of directors of Maltese company offering online games of chance in Austria
The CJEU clarifies two important issues regarding the application of the Rome II Regulation: the scope of the exception relating to corporate matters and the determination of the place of damage in the case of games of chance offered via the internet from one Member State in another Member State without the licence required in the latter Member State.
PUBLICATION
09 Feb, 2026
Notarial enforcement of pledges. Is Article 1872 of the Civil Code mandatory? In what sense?
The clause agreed upon must comply, for greater certainty, with the provisions of the new judicial enforcement procedure. It will be necessary to agree on an appraised value, which is not required in Article 1872 CC, because otherwise the award would be similar to a ‘forfeiture proviso’ (pactum commissorium), which the Civil Code neutralised with the drastic imposition of extinguishment of the debt in its entirety.
PUBLICATION
06 Feb, 2026
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 29
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.