Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises Kobus Asset Finance I on the financing of a renewables project
15 of September, 2022
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised Kobus Asset Finance I on the granting of financing to a special purpose vehicle owned by Exus Management Partners. The financing is for the construction and commissioning of a photovoltaic park in Portugal and will be financially guaranteed by the European Investment Fund (EIF).
Professionals from the Madrid and Lisbon offices have advised on the transaction: Verónica Romaní and Mafalda Barreto, partners, Vanessa Armas, of counsel of Banking, Luísa Carrilho da Graça and Leonor Rocha, associates of Mercantil, João Marques Rodrigues, associate of Urbanism and Fernando Artiach, associate of Banking.
Read the full article.
Professionals from the Madrid and Lisbon offices have advised on the transaction: Verónica Romaní and Mafalda Barreto, partners, Vanessa Armas, of counsel of Banking, Luísa Carrilho da Graça and Leonor Rocha, associates of Mercantil, João Marques Rodrigues, associate of Urbanism and Fernando Artiach, associate of Banking.
Read the full article.
Lawyer mentioned
Verónica Romaní – Partner
Mafalda Barreto – Partner
See all lawyers
See less lawyers
Tipology
Deal
Press contact
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
23 Feb, 2026 
PUBLICATION
09 Feb, 2026
Notarial enforcement of pledges. Is Article 1872 of the Civil Code mandatory? In what sense?
The clause agreed upon must comply, for greater certainty, with the provisions of the new judicial enforcement procedure. It will be necessary to agree on an appraised value, which is not required in Article 1872 CC, because otherwise the award would be similar to a ‘forfeiture proviso’ (pactum commissorium), which the Civil Code neutralised with the drastic imposition of extinguishment of the debt in its entirety.
09 Feb, 2026 
PUBLICATION
06 Feb, 2026
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 29
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
06 Feb, 2026
PUBLICATION
15 Dec, 2025
Direct harm due to de facto expulsion: Article 241 of the Companies Act (Supreme Court Judgment, First Chamber, 22 October 2025)
This paper analyses the subject matter scope of application of a ‘director liability to shareholder claim’ (claim for payment of damages filed by a shareholder against a company director). Although, as a general rule, shareholders cannot claim compensation for the harm caused to their share in a company’s estate, compensation for de facto expulsions or harm to liquidating dividends may be awarded through a director liability to shareholder claim.
15 Dec, 2025
PUBLICATION
11 Dec, 2025
Do consumer associations have universal locus standi? On the subject of two orders issued by the Provincial Court of Barcelona regarding the ‘car cartel’
The universal standing of consumer associations has no legal basis and creates perverse effects.
11 Dec, 2025
PUBLICATION
21 Nov, 2025
Compensation for loss of office ‘under market conditions’ provided for in articles of association
Judgment analyses claim filed by former CEO for non-payment of loss-of-office compensation provided for in articles of association (legal regime preceding the 2014 amendments to the Companies Act).
21 Nov, 2025
PUBLICATION
14 Nov, 2025
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 28
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
14 Nov, 2025
PUBLICATION
17 Oct, 2025
Impact on directors of company debts and penalties under a sector-specific rule
We analyse, in short, whether company payment contributions can be included in director liability (to company) claims.
17 Oct, 2025
PUBLICATION
09 Oct, 2025
Payment service providers’ rectification of unauthorised or incorrectly executed payment transactions: user obligations
The Court of Justice of the European Union (Fourth Chamber), in its judgment of 1 August 2025, case C-665/23, IL v. Veracash SAS, concludes that a payer is deprived of the right to reimbursement of the amount of an unauthorised transaction if he or she delayed in notifying his or her payment service provider of the unauthorised payment transaction, even though he or she did so within 13 months from the debit date. This interpretation of the Payment Services Directive is applicable in Spain (Art. 43 RDL 19/2018) and appears to be retained in the future Regulation on payment services.
09 Oct, 2025
PUBLICATION
01 Oct, 2025
Contractual termination by mutual abandonment not claimed by any party?
The risks of applying the doctrine according to which a contract is deemed withdrawn from if neither party to the same appears to want it. Not only is this solution likely to be inconsistent with the parties' claims, but it also wrongly rules out other civil law options the parties could pursue upon dismissal of the action for declaration of termination.
01 Oct, 2025