Go back to News
NEWS
GA_P advises Housfy in a 30 million Euro Series B round of financing
13 of May, 2022
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo has advised Housfy in a Series B financing round of 30 million Euro. The round has been led by the British fund Frog Capital. Banco Santander, A/O PropTech, DN Capital, Seaya Ventures, Aldea Ventures and ICF have also participated.
Housfy is a digital real estate services platform. The company, which has closed six rounds of financing to date for a total amount of 52.7 million, plans to allocate the new capital injection to the development of the platform to further improve the user experience and integrate new services, making the processes easier and more accessible to all consumers. In addition, the capital infusion will also serve to boost the company’s business in Portugal and Italy.
David González and Clara Rivero, Mercantil partner and associate, advised on the transaction.
Housfy is a digital real estate services platform. The company, which has closed six rounds of financing to date for a total amount of 52.7 million, plans to allocate the new capital injection to the development of the platform to further improve the user experience and integrate new services, making the processes easier and more accessible to all consumers. In addition, the capital infusion will also serve to boost the company’s business in Portugal and Italy.
David González and Clara Rivero, Mercantil partner and associate, advised on the transaction.
Press contact
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
Director of Business Development, Marketing and Communications
More information about
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
23 Feb, 2026 
PUBLICATION
09 Feb, 2026
Notarial enforcement of pledges. Is Article 1872 of the Civil Code mandatory? In what sense?
The clause agreed upon must comply, for greater certainty, with the provisions of the new judicial enforcement procedure. It will be necessary to agree on an appraised value, which is not required in Article 1872 CC, because otherwise the award would be similar to a ‘forfeiture proviso’ (pactum commissorium), which the Civil Code neutralised with the drastic imposition of extinguishment of the debt in its entirety.
09 Feb, 2026 
PUBLICATION
06 Feb, 2026
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 29
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
06 Feb, 2026
PUBLICATION
15 Dec, 2025
Direct harm due to de facto expulsion: Article 241 of the Companies Act (Supreme Court Judgment, First Chamber, 22 October 2025)
This paper analyses the subject matter scope of application of a ‘director liability to shareholder claim’ (claim for payment of damages filed by a shareholder against a company director). Although, as a general rule, shareholders cannot claim compensation for the harm caused to their share in a company’s estate, compensation for de facto expulsions or harm to liquidating dividends may be awarded through a director liability to shareholder claim.
15 Dec, 2025
PUBLICATION
11 Dec, 2025
Do consumer associations have universal locus standi? On the subject of two orders issued by the Provincial Court of Barcelona regarding the ‘car cartel’
The universal standing of consumer associations has no legal basis and creates perverse effects.
11 Dec, 2025
PUBLICATION
21 Nov, 2025
Compensation for loss of office ‘under market conditions’ provided for in articles of association
Judgment analyses claim filed by former CEO for non-payment of loss-of-office compensation provided for in articles of association (legal regime preceding the 2014 amendments to the Companies Act).
21 Nov, 2025
PUBLICATION
14 Nov, 2025
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 28
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
14 Nov, 2025
PUBLICATION
17 Oct, 2025
Impact on directors of company debts and penalties under a sector-specific rule
We analyse, in short, whether company payment contributions can be included in director liability (to company) claims.
17 Oct, 2025
PUBLICATION
01 Oct, 2025
Contractual termination by mutual abandonment not claimed by any party?
The risks of applying the doctrine according to which a contract is deemed withdrawn from if neither party to the same appears to want it. Not only is this solution likely to be inconsistent with the parties' claims, but it also wrongly rules out other civil law options the parties could pursue upon dismissal of the action for declaration of termination.
01 Oct, 2025
PUBLICATION
05 Aug, 2025
Automotive and Sustainable Mobility No. 27
Summary of legislative and jurisprudential developments relating to the automotive sector.
05 Aug, 2025