PUBLICATIONS

Subscribe to our content

Do you want to keep up to date with the latest legislative developments and publications produced by our Academic Council, as well as all our events?

You can do it by registering here.

icon

    I have read and consent to the processing of my personal data in accordance with the basic and additional information on data protection set out in the Privacy Policy*..

    Basic information on data protection:

    • Responsible: GOMEZ ACEBO & POMBO ABOGADOS S.L.P.

    • Purposes: To periodically receive newsletters, current legal publications and information on events and activities, according to the areas and sectors of interest indicated.

    • Rights: Consent and legitimate interest.

    • Communication / Recipients: Access to data by service providers.

    • Rights: Access, rectification, deletion, limitation, opposition, portability, withdrawal of consent, not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, and the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority.

    • Further information: Additional and detailed information on Data Protection can be found in the Privacy policy.

    icon Go back to
    Apply filters
    Filter by… icon
    Analysis
    Area Banking and Finance
    Sector Financial Services, Fintech & Insurtech
    Payment service providers’ rectification of unauthorised or incorrectly executed payment transactions: user obligations
    The Court of Justice of the European Union (Fourth Chamber), in its judgment of 1 August 2025, case C-665/23, IL v. Veracash SAS, concludes that a payer is deprived of the right to reimbursement of the amount of an unauthorised transaction if he or she delayed in notifying his or her payment service provider of the unauthorised payment transaction, even though he or she did so within 13 months from the debit date. This interpretation of the Payment Services Directive is applicable in Spain (Art. 43 RDL 19/2018) and appears to be retained in the future Regulation on payment services.
    icon 09 Oct, 2025
    icon Reyes Palá
    icon icon
    Analysis
    Area Insolvency
    How does a right to purchase or repurchase operate in relation to an insolvent estate?
    For the first time in the Supreme Court: purchase rights in insolvency proceedings.
    icon 08 Oct, 2025
    icon Ángel Carrasco
    icon icon
    Analysis
    Area Corporate and M&A
    Contractual termination by mutual abandonment not claimed by any party?
    The risks of applying the doctrine according to which a contract is deemed withdrawn from if neither party to the same appears to want it. Not only is this solution likely to be inconsistent with the parties’ claims, but it also wrongly rules out other civil law options the parties could pursue upon dismissal of the action for declaration of termination.
    icon 01 Oct, 2025
    icon Ángel Carrasco
    icon icon
    Analysis
    Area Competition and European Union law
    Court of Justice rules that lower courts may disregard decisions of higher courts that violate independence and impartiality
    The Court of Justice ruling of 4 September 2025 (C-225/22) has declared that national courts may set aside decisions of higher courts that do not comply with the requirements of independence and impartiality derived from Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
    icon 30 Sep, 2025
    icon Blanca Lozano
    icon icon
    Analysis
    Area Corporate Governance
    Invalidity of agreements concluded by director in breach of duty of loyalty
    In Judgment no. 142/2025 of 11 April, the Madrid Provincial Court (Twenty-Eighth Chamber) addressed two issues relating to the bringing of actions for declaration of invalidity of two sale and purchase agreements concluded by a company director in breach of his duty of loyalty. On the one hand, and in view of the specific circumstances, it ruled on whether the company could formally assume the role of claimant in the dispute. On the other hand, it ruled on the importance of the fact that the disputed transactions were beneficial to the company concerned and on the possibility of a ‘tacit’ dispensation.
    icon 29 Sep, 2025
    icon Alberto Díaz
    icon icon
    Analysis
    Area Competition and European Union law
    Sector Energy
    Prohibition of arbitration in the single energy market
    The Agreement on the interpretation and application of the Energy Charter Treaty gives the force and effect of law to the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, according to which Article 26 of the Energy Charter Treaty does not and could not apply as a legal basis for intra-EU arbitration proceedings as a mechanism for the settlement of disputes between a contracting State and an investor of another contracting State.
    icon 25 Sep, 2025
    icon Ana I. Mendoza
    icon icon

    Meet ours
    Counsels

    icon
    icon
    Ricardo Alonso
    Ricardo Alonso
    Academic Counsel
    icon icon
    Pilar Álvarez
    Pilar Álvarez
    Academic Counsel
    icon icon
    Oriol Mir
    Oriol Mir
    Academic Counsel
    Luciano Parejo
    Luciano Parejo
    Academic Counsel
    icon icon
    Lourdes López
    Lourdes López
    Academic Counsel
    icon icon
    Juan Alfonso Santamaría
    Juan Alfonso Santamaría
    Academic Counsel
    Inés Fontes
    Inés Fontes
    Academic Counsel
    Fernando Marín de la Bárcena
    Fernando Marín de la Bárcena
    Academic Counsel
    icon icon
    Faustino Cordón
    Faustino Cordón
    Academic Counsel
    icon icon
    Elisa Torralba
    Elisa Torralba
    Academic Counsel
    icon icon
    Blanca Lozano
    Blanca Lozano
    Academic Counsel
    Ángel García Vidal
    Ángel García Vidal
    Academic Counsel
    icon icon
    Ángel Carrasco
    Ángel Carrasco
    Academic Counsel
    Ana I. Mendoza
    Ana I. Mendoza
    Academic Counsel
    Alberto Díaz
    Academic Counsel
    icon icon
    Agustín García
    Agustín García
    Academic Counsel
    icon
    icon